Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Bushwalking topics that are not location specific.
Forum rules
The place for bushwalking topics that are not location specific.

Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby under10kg » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 6:41 am

Hi Guys,
There has been some discussion in other posts of heavy packs relating to body weight.
I notice a nols course in australia where you carry 45% of body weight.
Would any guys here do such a course and pay many thousands?
http://www.nols.edu/courses/pdf/pacific ... abc_cd.pdf
Last edited by under10kg on Fri 12 Mar, 2010 7:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
under10kg
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon 15 Oct, 2007 6:33 am
Location: Australia
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby ollster » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 7:04 am

Considering that would make the pack weight about 43-44kgs... um, no thanks.
"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member."
User avatar
ollster
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 3975
Joined: Tue 02 Sep, 2008 4:14 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: LoveMyGoat.com
Region: Australia

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Taurë-rana » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 9:44 am

It would be an amazing trip, but that much weight in that much heat would be scary - I'm not sure why the weight is so high, when I walked in Kakadu the pack weight was so much less than here because you didn't have to have all your cold weather gear. It's the many thousands that would definitely prevent me doing it though.
Peak bagging points: 170ish
Recent walks - Picton, Wylds Crag, Rogoona
User avatar
Taurë-rana
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon 14 Jan, 2008 8:28 pm
Location: Devonport
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Nuts » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 10:05 am

Ridiculous! Seems it would teach submission rather than 'leadership'... There's a 'course' for everything and someone for every job :roll:
I guess the greed keeps the regulators in work also, what a crazy world this is!
Hey... You also get to practice 'fasting', spose' that'll save a buck :wink:
User avatar
Nuts
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 8555
Joined: Sat 05 Apr, 2008 12:22 pm
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Taurë-rana » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 10:38 am

Nuts wrote:Hey... You also get to practice 'fasting', spose' that'll save a buck :wink:


That seemed a bit weird to me - fasting and carrying a heavy pack? Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me!
Peak bagging points: 170ish
Recent walks - Picton, Wylds Crag, Rogoona
User avatar
Taurë-rana
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon 14 Jan, 2008 8:28 pm
Location: Devonport
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby photohiker » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 11:00 am

This part of the course builds on the skills you’ve learned and practiced and allows you to travel without instructors for 1 to 5 days. Students are aware of where the instructors and the other student groups are planning to travel and camp. The instructors may be up to 24 hours away from the students.


NOLS does not permit students to use personal cell or satellite phones or other communication devices including personal tracking devices (e.g. SPOT), while in the field. Additionally, students are not permitted to take personal music players (iPods, MP3 players, CD players, etc). Instructors will be carrying sufficient communication equipment (usually a satellite phone) to handle any emergencies that may arise.


By the sound of that, it's only a matter of time before we hear about them in the news.

Apart from the pack weight requirement (maybe they mean maximum, not average - the food resupply is 8-10 days), this looks like a bit of silliness. Are these man vs wild trainees?

Distance is about 155km in 35 days - about 5km per day. I know there's some rough country in the Kimberly but if they are spending all their time in that, then the pack weights look even more out of step.
Michael
User avatar
photohiker
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 3097
Joined: Sun 17 May, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: Adelaide, dreaming up where to go next.

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Franco » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 11:50 am

There are several that boast in the forums about regularly carrying weights like that. To find them just look for a thread on pain killers.
Franco
Franco
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2916
Joined: Thu 30 Oct, 2008 6:48 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Lizzy » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 1:43 pm

Reminiscent of OBA (Outward Bound Australia).......heavy packs, no technology, solo.
User avatar
Lizzy
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1055
Joined: Mon 16 Nov, 2009 1:13 pm
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Female

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Macca81 » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 2:29 pm

thats 51kg for me... i could do it (have done so before, for a day), but i wouldnt enjoy it
geoskid wrote:nothing but the best of several brands will do :)
User avatar
Macca81
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 644
Joined: Wed 08 Apr, 2009 3:02 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Herbalife
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Taurë-rana » Fri 12 Mar, 2010 3:07 pm

Franco wrote:There are several that boast in the forums about regularly carrying weights like that. To find them just look for a thread on pain killers.
Franco
:lol: :lol: :lol:

It's only 24kg for me, no problems! :?
Peak bagging points: 170ish
Recent walks - Picton, Wylds Crag, Rogoona
User avatar
Taurë-rana
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Mon 14 Jan, 2008 8:28 pm
Location: Devonport
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby under10kg » Sat 13 Mar, 2010 7:37 am

I lost 10 ks over the last month or os.
Drat, I only can carry 30ks now :D
under10kg
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon 15 Oct, 2007 6:33 am
Location: Australia
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby CoffeeLover » Tue 16 Mar, 2010 9:23 pm

Sounds like torture to me. I need to see a clear reason for doing something or it does my head in.
CoffeeLover
Nothofagus cunninghamii
Nothofagus cunninghamii
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu 25 Feb, 2010 5:45 am
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Female

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Lindsay » Wed 17 Mar, 2010 2:08 pm

45% of body weight? That would be around 46kg for me. As one who was complaining of carrying only around 15% body weight (16kg) I doubt I would be signing up for this.
User avatar
Lindsay
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu 01 Oct, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Drifting » Wed 17 Mar, 2010 6:30 pm

57 kg? GET BENT! That's what mules are for!

Actually, I wonder if I could get a mule to carry a bit of my weight, maybe a gut and a cheek?
All good things are wild, and free.
User avatar
Drifting
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Mon 02 Nov, 2009 8:24 am
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby CoffeeLover » Wed 17 Mar, 2010 8:44 pm

I've never been on a walk with a mule, but now I'm thinking i've been missing out. From now on I'm not carrying anything!
CoffeeLover
Nothofagus cunninghamii
Nothofagus cunninghamii
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu 25 Feb, 2010 5:45 am
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Female

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Ent » Sat 20 Mar, 2010 3:10 pm

Um? 45% of 108 kilograms gives 48.6 kilograms. I love luxury but as they say excess in anything will eventually kill you :shock:

What on earth is the purpose? Bit like non-military people paying huge amount of money to have people shout at them as they haul logs around. O'well hopefully participants will not undergo a crystal light bath and be presented with a contact for their house to sign as they collapse into a heap.

Cheers Brett
"lt only took six years. From now on, l´ll write two letters a week instead of one."
(Shawshank Redemption)
User avatar
Ent
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 4059
Joined: Tue 13 May, 2008 3:38 pm
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Molly- » Tue 22 Jun, 2010 11:53 am

i went on a one-night hike, and i got my pack down to 15k, was pritty pleased with that, im a tad scared of what my 2-night pack is going to weigh though :?

molly- :D
Molly-
Nothofagus gunnii
Nothofagus gunnii
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun 20 Jun, 2010 6:26 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Female

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Moondog55 » Tue 22 Jun, 2010 2:27 pm

I did a quick read and something sounds wrong, unless that 45% is with 3 days of water supply, I did a walk in the Flinders Ranges once and I had to carry almost 20 liters of water on one 3-day section.
Ve are too soon old und too late schmart
Moondog55
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 11130
Joined: Thu 03 Dec, 2009 4:15 pm
Location: Norlane Geelong Victoria Australia
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby WarrenH » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 6:46 am

When I read something like this, I'm reminded of that classic old saying, "Common sense 'aint that common."

45% of body weight, what is in the pack, a '50s style canvas Scout tent with sturdy ironbark tent poles? I remember going on a scout hike once and I got to carry one ironbark tent pole, both halves of it ... within a week after returning from that hike, I was in the Sea Scouts.

I don't even haul 35% of my body weight on a cycle tour and that includes the weight of the bike, and all the bike bits and essential spares and what I need to haul around to camp comfortably for weeks.

On the nols course they take 35 days to walk 155 kilometres ... WHAT!!! ... at that slack rate, they should up the pack weight to at least 65% and only get to eat gravel.

Warren.
WarrenH
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu 07 Jan, 2010 6:54 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby ILUVSWTAS » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 8:25 am

30kg (ish) for me. I have carried 26kg, but will never do it again.
Nothing to see here.
User avatar
ILUVSWTAS
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 11027
Joined: Sun 28 Dec, 2008 9:53 am
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby whiskeylover » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 6:28 pm

Come on guys, harden up. I am female, weigh 56kgs and can still carry 20-22kg easily although prefer to bring it down to about 15-17kg which is healthier for my older body now. In my youth (read early 20s) I weighed 52kg, and could carry a 26kg pack (= 50%) as long as someone else put it on my back for me. Easily walk 20km in a day or more with this. Big steps up needed a little shove from behind or a hand up, but possible. Pretty funny though if you pushed me over, cause I couldn't get back up. Actually come to think of it, I've had joint problems ever since. Oh well, here's to those who enjoy walking regardless of whether they are ultralighters or comfortable walkers.
medicinal purposes only of course
User avatar
whiskeylover
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri 27 Jun, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: Deloraine
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Lindsay » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 7:23 pm

What is comfortable about carrying around half your body weight? Especially if you need help to stand up? :? But if that's what you enjoy then good luck to you whiskeylover. :D
User avatar
Lindsay
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu 01 Oct, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby tasadam » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 7:45 pm

Lindsay wrote:What is comfortable about carrying around half your body weight?

The pace would be comfortable.
I think I have mentioned before that I started a 16 day walk carrying about half my weight. So long as you take your time, recognize that your load is heavy and act accordingly, it's quite possible and acceptable. Shorter days, slower pace, more rests, be fit to start with... Just using your head.
Mind you, it's not for everyone.
User avatar
tasadam
Magnus administratio
Magnus administratio
 
Posts: 5900
Joined: Tue 10 Apr, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: TasmaniART, Smitten Merino, Macpac
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Liamy77 » Sat 26 Jun, 2010 11:52 pm

Sounds like fun tho... i was going to do it the other day ... but i sooked out and chose to drive large nails through my feet instead :shock:
perhaps not my cuppa tea...Maybe if it was a hurt mate. Otherwise maybe if ya threw in a horse!
i'd rather do a few more walks and skip the knee surgery!
Taggunnah
GRAVITY... IS A HARSH MISTRESS!
knowledge's lighter than gadgets..but gadgets can be fun!
User avatar
Liamy77
Auctorita modica
Auctorita modica
 
Posts: 1552
Joined: Tue 20 Apr, 2010 4:36 pm
Location: Southern Channel, Tas.... but sometimes i leave n walk around elsewhere!
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Woodbridge Organics
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby corvus » Sun 27 Jun, 2010 10:26 pm

whiskeylover wrote:Come on guys, harden up. I am female, weigh 56kgs and can still carry 20-22kg easily although prefer to bring it down to about 15-17kg which is healthier for my older body now. In my youth (read early 20s) I weighed 52kg, and could carry a 26kg pack (= 50%) as long as someone else put it on my back for me. Easily walk 20km in a day or more with this. Big steps up needed a little shove from behind or a hand up, but possible. Pretty funny though if you pushed me over, cause I couldn't get back up. Actually come to think of it, I've had joint problems ever since. Oh well, here's to those who enjoy walking regardless of whether they are ultralighters or comfortable walkers.


Get paid on occasions to carry supplies into the Cradle reserve a wee 4.5 to 5 hour stroll ,gung ho and being male I said no worries I can take 14 kg of fresh food sheesh rapid learning exercise my basic pack being around 15 kg I ended up with a burden really more than I should have attempted ,did it but suffered from really sore hips for a few days after .
Did the same thing later and reduced my input to 10kg and ate with the group ,no aches or pains so now know my limitations as we all should .
corvus
collige virgo rosas
User avatar
corvus
Vercundus gearus-freakius
Vercundus gearus-freakius
 
Posts: 5488
Joined: Mon 23 Apr, 2007 7:24 pm
Location: Devonport
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Ent » Tue 29 Jun, 2010 12:51 am

Carried 38 kilograms kilograms once as an exercise in seeing if I could. Yes I could but that was the flat way around to Hazard Beach and even then the small climb was massive. Regularly carry 25 to 28 kilograms working on the principle that if I am used to that weight then longer trips are done at the same weight but a lot less luxury. Still at 108 kilograms that is less than 25% of body mass so take my hat off to anyone attempting larger percentage loads. Actually, with modern stuff the need to go above 25 kilograms is rather reduced unless you are a camera buff (like Tasadam) and then those lovely professional all glass lens add up not to mention tripod, etc.

Cheers Brett
"lt only took six years. From now on, l´ll write two letters a week instead of one."
(Shawshank Redemption)
User avatar
Ent
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 4059
Joined: Tue 13 May, 2008 3:38 pm
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby Molly- » Fri 02 Jul, 2010 2:29 pm

I'm female, and i think my heavyest pack was about 17ks i think i was 13, highfive to the famales :D
Molly-
Nothofagus gunnii
Nothofagus gunnii
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun 20 Jun, 2010 6:26 pm
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Female

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby 22F » Sun 11 Jul, 2010 1:15 pm

I used to do that for work when I was playing soldiers.

Absolutely no freaking way I'd do it again on my time unless I have to.

Why would you inflict that on yourself unless the Zombie Apocalypse has started??
Forward!
Where we are, where we belong, where we should be.
22F
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri 28 May, 2010 11:39 am
Location: Back in Bris-vegas, lost in the brightlights of the Big Smoke
Region: Queensland
Gender: Male

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby NickD » Mon 12 Jul, 2010 10:54 am

I have carried over 50% of my body weight on occasions. I have already been told that it is ridicolous, so you need not bother, its for work and I enjoy my work. In guiding season I weigh 75Kg (put on some winter weight at the moment :lol: ) and my pack hit 40kg, once or twice for the first couple of days of certain trips. Generally its below 35kg for an Overland Track or Walls of Jerusalem, but during an evacuation of a client I carried both hers and my packs bring the weight to a sagging 50kg. Whilst I know that its not a good idea, I am just a young man enjoying the challenge and being outdoors on a daily basis.
The one advantage is, on my personal trips, the pack weighs about 17kg for 2 or 3 nights and it feels wonderfully like a day pack.

Pretty sure the army folk carry even bigger packs...
User avatar
NickD
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon 07 Jul, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Travellers Retreat
Region: Tasmania

Re: Pack Weight 45% of body weight

Postby ILUVSWTAS » Mon 12 Jul, 2010 10:56 am

NickD wrote:I have carried over 50% of my body weight on occasions. I have already been told that it is ridicolous, so you need not bother, its for work and I enjoy my work. In guiding season I weigh 75Kg (put on some winter weight at the moment :lol: ) and my pack hit 40kg, once or twice for the first couple of days of certain trips. Generally its below 35kg for an Overland Track or Walls of Jerusalem, but during an evacuation of a client I carried both hers and my packs bring the weight to a sagging 50kg. Whilst I know that its not a good idea, I am just a young man enjoying the challenge and being outdoors on a daily basis.
The one advantage is, on my personal trips, the pack weighs about 17kg for 2 or 3 nights and it feels wonderfully like a day pack.

Pretty sure the army folk carry even bigger packs...



Yes, Wifes got a reli in the special forces. They carry 60kg packs and a 20kg ammo belt. Good luck to them......
Nothing to see here.
User avatar
ILUVSWTAS
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 11027
Joined: Sun 28 Dec, 2008 9:53 am
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Next

Return to Bushwalking Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests