neilmny wrote:A tad off topic but you would be amazed where I could take my wifes old 1974? KE75? Corolla. It would go anywhere (almost).
Xplora I wouldn't waste my money on anything other than a Landcruiser. Mine never let me down and several people I know who own them swear by them and have had the same experience..............personal choices.
I don't want to raise your ire xplora (I've seen the result when others do that

) but I think you should qualify why you think PVC shouldn't buy one otherwise it looks a little like the old redundant Ford v Holden argument.
It is a personal choice and those I know who own Landcruisers are very devoted to them. I thought I had mentioned why PCV should not buy one but I will expand.
To get one with a live axle in a wagon it would be quite old now and likely to have done some considerable distance. I am not a fan of independent suspension and booted CV joints for proper 4wding. The first gives you considerably less front wheel travel and the second (which is necessary with the first)is a weak point because they are easily damaged. This is partly why I say they are over-rate, referring to later 100 series and the 200 series. You should check the CV boots after every trip off road. All it takes is a stick to rip one and if not replaced quickly then you are up for a new CV joint. I doubt PCV would be into the serious 4wd stuff that I would do and maybe yourself anyway but I have ripped CV boots just on dirt roads. For PCV I would imagine it is more about having a tool to get you a bit further along the track than the trusty Corolla. The RAV4, all my jokes aside, will do this for him. But when I was instructing people I told them that 4wd will always take you into more trouble than it will get you out of. The 100 series did have options for live axles front and rear early on but if your car buying budget is limited then you would have to look at an 80 series, something in the early 90's, to get under $10000 and most of them will have around 400000km or more. To buy something in a later model 100 series you will be paying near $20000 for anything reasonable and then regardless of the model you will need deep pockets for the sort of travelling PCV does just to pay for fuel. It is not a very good around town car either. We are talking about something over 2 tonne and would run 15l/100 km on a good day. If we start talking about the pseudo Landcruiser (Prado) then all this changes. They are cheaper to buy and depending on the engine configuration they could be cheaper to run but nothing like a RAV4 2 litre petrol. Their build quality does not lend itself to consistent rough driving and it may be difficult to find a good one at a reasonable price. I am not a person to have an allegiance to any brand. My advice was more to the point there are many other vehicles which will do the required job and cost less. They are not the 'ducks guts' of 4wd's and like most cars have their own series of common faults. Some people, without experience in these matters, may be led to believe you should buy one because of an outdated reputation when there are many other cheaper alternatives. Toyota ran on this reputation for a long time, just as it did with the Hilux (which they subsequently ruined also). A friend of mine who toured regularly with us drove an 84 Range Rover and the Landcruiser people would laugh at him and call him a liar when he told them the tracks we had done. No lift of mods. I find most Landcruiser owners are very much guilty of the redundant Ford vs Holden type argument. I found this article which gives a good summary
https://www.motoring.com.au/buying-a-us ... ies-22853/Hope this clarifies enough.
neilmny wrote:I don't want to raise your ire xplora (I've seen the result when others do that

)
Am I that scary? Written words are always read harsher but I have to admit I am always up for a spirited debate. I do try not to make it personal. No ire raised in my response. Just factual opinion.