I also have a fairly good quality point and shoot camera. About $350 many years ago, probably equivalent to about $600 with a comparable model today. If I ever want 'real' photos, I always take this unit along. The problem is it is fairly bulky and is in no way waterproof (but then, neither is my phone). You have to hand it from a strap around your neck. It is also getting a bit old in the tooth and some problems are appearing.
I have been looking at getting a waterproof camera, something like the Nikon Coolpix AW130, Olympus Tough TG-4 or the Panasonic Lumix FT6. These are around $300-$400. No idea which one, so if anyone has any pointers in that direction, then good.
The problem is these are waterproof cameras (which I presume you need for bushwalking), so are not known for their sterling image quality. They are more about the waterproofing than the lens, etc. In fact, none have much of a zoom at all, naturally. While I do not expect professional quality images, I do want something that is point and shoot, and a lot better than a phone camera. And it is this last point that is the worry - are these cameras that much better than a phone? I ask this as my wife is pretty sure that we don't need a need camera
