(Ultra)Lightweight pack options

A place to chat about gear and the philosphy of ultralight. Ultralight bushwalking or backpacking focuses on carrying the lightest and simplest kit. There is still a good focus on safety and skill.
Forum rules
Ultralight Bushwalking/backpacking is about more than just gear lists. Ultralight walkers carefully consider gear based on the environment they are entering, the weather forecast, their own skill, other people in the group. Gear and systems are tested and tweaked.
If you are new to this area then welcome - Please remember that although the same ultralight philosophy can be used in all environments that the specific gear and skill required will vary greatly. It is very dangerous to assume that you can just copy someone else's gear list, but you are encouraged to ask questions, learn and start reducing the pack weight and enjoying the freedom that comes.

Common words
Base pack backpacking the mass of the backpack and the gear inside - not including consumables such as food, water and fuel
light backpacking base weight less than 9.1kg
ultralight backpacking base weight less than 4.5kg
super-ultralight backpacking base weight less than 2.3kg
extreme-ultralight backpacking base weight less than 1.4kg

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby simonm » Sat 02 May, 2015 4:55 am

This is a link that was posted somewhere on here I think with some comparison of fabrics - https://hillpeoplegear.com/Forum/tabid/ ... fault.aspx. Dyneema Gridstop did not fare so well.

Joomy is Dyneema X-Grid the same asDyneema Gridstop or Dyneema Ripstop in the above link?

I have been meaning to get some X-Pac in for quite some time.
simonm
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue 30 Apr, 2013 4:40 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Tier Gear Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby Joomy » Sat 02 May, 2015 10:58 am

Interesting article. The "Dyneema Gridstop" in that is the 140d variant. That's the type that Gossamer Gear use. The more common one is the one Zpacks use and is 210d and about 4.8oz/yd^2. It also has an extra diamond ripstop pattern in the weave: http://www.zpacks.com/large_image.shtml ... eema_l.jpg

I have made a daypack out of it and can attest to its relative durability. But 500d Cordura it is definitely not.
Joomy
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 601
Joined: Tue 22 May, 2012 6:40 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby simonm » Sat 02 May, 2015 3:38 pm

Thanks Joomy. I actually have a custom Zpacks pack which I bought second hand which is obviously the 210d - it does seem fairly robust for it's weight.
simonm
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue 30 Apr, 2013 4:40 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Tier Gear Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby flywire » Sat 13 Jun, 2015 9:18 pm

Joomy wrote:My perfect pack:
-Flexible carbon frame with suspended mesh panel a la Zpacks but with slightly heavier stock suitable up to 20-25kg. ...

+1 but I can't see why hollow carbon fibre wouldn't be more efficient (and more widely available) for a frame than strap. The kite makers probably have some good joining pieces for the stays too.
flywire
Atherosperma moschatum
Atherosperma moschatum
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun 06 Jul, 2014 12:01 am
Region: Australia

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby Mark F » Sat 13 Jun, 2015 10:43 pm

Only thing I'm not super keen on is the roll top closure top... But then I can't think of anything better.

I agree - I don't really like the US style roll top closures. Laufbursche have an interesting take on the top closure of their packs - a combination of standard throat with an integrated hood with pocket.
"Perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove".
User avatar
Mark F
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon 19 Sep, 2011 8:14 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby simonm » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 6:29 am

Mark F wrote:
Only thing I'm not super keen on is the roll top closure top... But then I can't think of anything better.

I agree - I don't really like the US style roll top closures. Laufbursche have an interesting take on the top closure of their packs - a combination of standard throat with an integrated hood with pocket.


Mark - Thanks for the link to Laufbursche - I had not heard of them before.
simonm
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue 30 Apr, 2013 4:40 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Tier Gear Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby DanShell » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 8:54 am

simonm wrote:
Mark F wrote:
Only thing I'm not super keen on is the roll top closure top... But then I can't think of anything better.

I agree - I don't really like the US style roll top closures. Laufbursche have an interesting take on the top closure of their packs - a combination of standard throat with an integrated hood with pocket.


Mark - Thanks for the link to Laufbursche - I had not heard of them before.


Me either, I am loving their lightweight packs but not the harness system. Put a good harness system on that clean and basic pack and you have won me. Im not even sure Id put those stretchy water bottle side pockets on, they too difficult to get a bottle in and out of while wearing the pack anyway.
Last edited by DanShell on Sun 14 Jun, 2015 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DanShell
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon 18 Mar, 2013 11:23 am
Location: Central
Region: Tasmania
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby Mark F » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 9:56 am

Laufbursche used to allow you to customise the packs - mine is an older model (40 litres) they seem to have become larger. I had mine made in DxG (Dyneema Grid Stop) body and side pockets, VX21 base for waterproofness and mesh back pocket. For the UL weights I carry (under 10kg all up for 7 days) the harness works perfectly well with a 4 folds of Z-Lite to give a bit of stiffness (doubles as a sit mat and under the feet at night)
"Perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove".
User avatar
Mark F
Lagarostrobos franklinii
Lagarostrobos franklinii
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon 19 Sep, 2011 8:14 pm
Region: Australian Capital Territory
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby Gadgetgeek » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 11:56 am

Just a thought on the carbon fiber idea. the guys who build custom quad and octo-copters use a lot of standardized parts now, so that might be a useful direction of inquiry.
Gadgetgeek
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Sun 23 Sep, 2012 4:10 pm
Region: Queensland
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby stry » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 2:02 pm

No mention of the Gossamer Gear Mariposa in this thread which is mildly surprising, as I thought a few forum contributors owned one. (I don't, but might)

Thoughts ????
stry
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon 10 Jun, 2013 6:28 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby simonm » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 4:06 pm

stry wrote:No mention of the Gossamer Gear Mariposa in this thread which is mildly surprising, as I thought a few forum contributors owned one. (I don't, but might)

Thoughts ????


My mate has the Mariposa and he carried it on our Overland Track walk. He rates it very highly. From the quick look I had it looked very well made, better than my Six Moon Designs Fusion 65 that's for sure.
simonm
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Tue 30 Apr, 2013 4:40 pm
ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS: Tier Gear Tasmania
Region: Tasmania

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby sim1oz » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 6:59 pm

Personal preference, as stated above, is key. All my suggestions have been captured above, eg. prefer to carry most of the weight on my hips, would like to be able to store wet gear (tarp/tent, rain gear) separately from dry gear via back pocket or separate bottom compartment, like sidepockets or somewhere to temporarily stash things like walking poles, like front/hip pockets which are removable.

Interestingly, I find my Golite Jam incredibly uncomfortable because I have never been able to adjust it to fit my back properly, and I love the roll top on my Aarn pack. So everyone has their own set of preferences! I have been thinking about about going lighter for walking on trails (when durability is not as much of an issue) and looked at the Zpacks, ULA and Hyperlite Mountain Gear websites, amongst others. I've got a few gear pieces I want to lighten up before I get a new pack, as my 3-seasons base weight is still 5kg. I'll be interested to see what your friend Benny comes up with.
Carpe diem!
User avatar
sim1oz
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 459
Joined: Mon 17 Jan, 2011 10:15 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Female

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby Gusto » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 9:53 pm

sim1oz, your desire to combine a good frame and harness with cuben is doable, provided money is no obstable.

http://www.cilogear.com/packs.html
http://www.mchalepacks.com/ultralight/index.htm


But if you know that your already happy with the Aarn, then you'd be better off stick with a cuben Aarn pack.
Gusto
Athrotaxis cupressoides
Athrotaxis cupressoides
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed 21 Sep, 2011 10:35 pm
Region: Victoria
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby Lindsay » Sun 14 Jun, 2015 10:52 pm

stry wrote:No mention of the Gossamer Gear Mariposa in this thread which is mildly surprising, as I thought a few forum contributors owned one. (I don't, but might)

Thoughts ????


I've used a Mariposa for a few years and am very pleased with it. Very comfortable and quite forgiving of abuse for a u/l pack. After some encounters with thick scrub and scraping over rocks it has a only few tears in the mesh pockets. The only problem I have is that it is slightly less well balanced and comfortable when there is a full bladder in the internal pocket, but this is a minor issue that is more than compensated for by the outstanding performance in other areas.
User avatar
Lindsay
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
Phyllocladus aspleniifolius
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Thu 01 Oct, 2009 3:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Region: New South Wales
Gender: Male

Re: (Ultra)Lightweight pack options

Postby kanangra » Mon 15 Jun, 2015 12:23 pm

I also have a Mariposa and pound for pound I think it is the best pack I've owned. I've just bought the latest one but I think I prefer my old one.

K.
kanangra
Athrotaxis selaginoides
Athrotaxis selaginoides
 
Posts: 1340
Joined: Sun 25 May, 2008 3:52 pm

Previous

Return to Ultralight backpacking

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests