GPSGuided wrote:Peasants have Mk1? I don't even have a RX100. Mk0 would be a dream come true.
wayno wrote:some of us peasants still have the mark 1...
wayno wrote:and some shops are still selling the mk one for up to $800
GPSGuided wrote:It's built for a compact and pocketable camera. Having a largish grip would detract from that original objective. But if that's what you need, check the following link.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=hand ... lAod538IEg
In this day and age, where they are made is hardly relevant. What's more important is whether the product has good design and QA along the way. Sony and Apple products are typically fine in this regard. If your objective was to support Australian manufacturing, sorry, no dice here.
Hiking Noob wrote:A couple of years ago I went from a Cheap Japanese made Lumix to a more expensive GH2 that was made in China and it was a heap of rubbish.
photohiker wrote:Really, the RX100 only needs a finger grip. The lens at full extension still has no weight in it.
RonK wrote:photohiker wrote:Really, the RX100 only needs a finger grip. The lens at full extension still has no weight in it.
It doesn't actually even "need" that. I've been using my Mk I quite happily without.
Hiking Noob wrote:I find cameras without it slightly awkward to use but that is no longer a problem as GPSGuided pointed out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests