lefroy wrote:Jealous! All I got was a letter saying I would receive a letter of 'nothing to see here bs' in the near future, still waiting
north-north-west wrote:290,000 shares worth a total of $29 = $0.00001 per share, or one hundredth of a cent each. What an investment opportunity!!!
Nuts wrote:What is it? Doesn't that document/ part of(?) represent DH's share in the company , not the lease payment? The other similar document clipped(?) on the FWAHAT page includes the other shareholders at $162500?
north-north-west wrote:290,000 shares worth a total of $29 = $0.00001 per share, or one hundredth of a cent each. What an investment opportunity!!!
Lophophaps wrote:The Court’s findings related to this legal point, not the merits of the proposal itself.
johnw wrote:Very disappointing, but I think it's important to note that they haven't given up just yet. Looks like the Federal Minister has the ball at present.
Nuts wrote: the problem, and it's fundamental. All quaff aside, who ever thought the intent of Wilderness World Heritage would ever include access exclusive on the basis of nothing more than wealth, unnecessary overflights and sectioned-off private areas treated to urban like planning?
Equally as concerning, it's apparent 'a 'proposal' is open ended. At Lake Rodway the proponent seems to have just added in a standing camp, at least (so far) in their own interpretation.
Lophophaps wrote: The private OLT huts are different in that they do not affect the masses staying at or near the PWS huts. Halls Island access is being severely curtailed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests