Well, I had thought of the Expedition Pockets, but was advised not to. Not sure if the pack is too big though. I am used to a 65L (which was a bit cramped for space), so did not really want to get anything smaller. The Effortless Rhythm does not have any side pockets and not much of a top lid, and there is no way to tie anything on top or bottom, so I am thinking I need all the space I can get. It is more of an alpine pack than a general purpose hiking pack, I am guessing.Strider wrote:I think the problem is you have gone too small on the balance pockets (and possibly also too large on the main pack). I have no problem fitting 1L Nalgenes or 1.5L PET bottles in the mesh bottle holsters on my Expedition pockets.
Yeah - was about to refute all this...but went back out and tried the pack on again just to see what I was missing. This time I used 1L filter bottles (that I have just received) in the front mesh pockets. I was quite surprised - they worked fairly well. I have been using silicone collapsible bottles and they have been a real pain to put back in. They are not rigid, so very hard to get in, plus they are also a bit 'sticky'.Strider wrote:To me it doesnt make sense to use a bladder when you can have two bottles right in front of you just 20cm from your nose. It seriously doesn't get any more convenient than this!
Yeah, certainly will. Have only done about 10-15km with the Aarn pack so far, and have mixed feelings about it. It is a good system in theory, but let down by weird differences. It would be great if Osprey and Aarn could get together and make a REALLY good pack, especially since they are so expensive. Anyway, only about 20km this weekend, and fairly easy at that (Albert River Circuit), so a good one to work stuff out on.Strider wrote:Definitely persevere with the bottles. You will learn to love them!
walkon wrote:While Osprey make an OK pack. I can't think of one thing of theirs that I would like on my aarn.
I like side pockets and a good lid pocket. My Aarn does not even have side pockets, That really bums me out as I like to stick little odds and ends in there that I might need quickly. ie raincoat. The front pockets are good, but not as big as side pockets and I am having a hard time replacing/working out where to put the stuff that was in my side pockets. I guess that in a few more trips I will have it all worked out, but for now I am missing a lot of things that are on a 'normal' pack.walkon wrote:While Osprey make an OK pack. I can't think of one thing of theirs that I would like on my aarn.
I agree with you completely!! The hydration system implementation in the Aarn pack is unusual to say the least.north-north-west wrote:I've always put my bladder on the top of the pack, flat, under the lid. Not ideal placement but it works for me. The one thing I wish Aarn would do is a bladder-ready main pack.
Understood - but it is not my practice to use water bottles. Up until now, at least. I have ALWAYS used a hydration bladder of some sort. It is what I am used to and am comfortable with. There are other benefits to using a water bladder - I can fill the thing with ice, for example.Lizzy wrote:I have the expedition pockets and use a couple of sport drink water bottles in the front mesh bit. Easy and convenient to get to while on the move. That's 1200ml and if I need more I fill a bladder which I can refill the sport bottle with. Works well for me.
kneighbour wrote: It would be great if Osprey and Aarn could get together and make a REALLY good pack,
Strider wrote:walkon wrote:While Osprey make an OK pack. I can't think of one thing of theirs that I would like on my aarn.
Build quality is the only thing Osprey do much much better than Aarn.
kneighbour wrote:I like side pockets and a good lid pocket. My Aarn does not even have side pockets, That really bums me out as I like to stick little odds and ends in there that I might need quickly. ie raincoat. The front pockets are good, but not as big as side pockets and I am having a hard time replacing/working out where to put the stuff that was in my side pockets. I guess that in a few more trips I will have it all worked out, but for now I am missing a lot of things that are on a 'normal' pack.
The thing I am finding with the front pockets is that they are not as handy as I had thought. You need to put your heavy stuff in the front pockets to make them most effective. So I have my kitchen in there, plus lights, battery, and anything I can find that is heavy. It also only fits small stuff so I am limited - basically some of what I would have put in the side pockets now goes in the balance pockets, plus my kitchen and water. So a lot of it is not stuff I need when walking. I still need to work out the loading, but I try to keep the top of the balance pockets free for stuff I might need quickly - ie nibbles, camera and water. So far not too successful in that as there is so little room, but no doubt will work it out.walkon wrote:My aarn has side pockets so can't help there. The sports pockets take something like 12 odd liters so and nothing on your back can be as handy to grap stuff as the front balance pockets.
If you are still unhappy with the pack shoot me a pm and maybe we can do a deal
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests