stepbystep wrote:Belongs in off track I reckon
stepbystep wrote:Shhhhhhhh......
http://doublesee.com.au/2013/06/03/conf ... ainlander/
Belongs in off track I reckon
stepbystep wrote:Shhhhhhhh......
http://doublesee.com.au/2013/06/03/conf ... ainlander/
Belongs in off track I reckon
geoskid wrote:The plot thickens - better not spoil it for the kids, eh?
Strider wrote:TerraMer would you at the very least be willing to say which state this occurred in? Very interesting.
Hallu wrote:Keeping it to yourself would be a bad thing for the species, we need fresh DNA samples in case we may recreate it some day, or we need to monitor them in case we could find more and make them thrive. I truly believe that not telling anyone is the worst thing you could do for the survival of the species if it still exists.
Strider wrote: I would love to see one, but the evidence is definitely against the possibility - I would tell someone but only those with an interest to regenerate the species.
stepbystep wrote:According to my sources PWS have known for years about certain 'colonies'.....
stepbystep wrote:According to my sources PWS have known for years about certain 'colonies'.....
north-north-west wrote:stepbystep wrote:According to my sources PWS have known for years about certain 'colonies'.....
Maybe there's a reason certain tracks are being left off maps . . .
sambar358 wrote:Always interesting to ponder their existence and there is certainly a lot of very remote country seldom trod still out there but I don't think either exist these days...but then again who can say for sure ???? Cheers
north-north-west wrote:stepbystep wrote:According to my sources PWS have known for years about certain 'colonies'.....
Maybe there's a reason certain tracks are being left off maps . . .
Return to Bushwalking Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests