photohiker wrote:Dodged a bullet there Warren! Good to still have you with us.![]()
Are you sure you would be dead today if you had been envenomated? You seem to have taken all the right steps, and I absolutely agree that getting into medical care is the number one priority but unless the venom hits a vein, or you go walking around and pumping the venom about, if you apply an adequate pressure bandage, don't you have significant time to get into care?
Talking of pressure bandages, this is a good time to remind ourselves that specific elastic pressure bandages work better than standard crepe bandages. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7830641 Setopress seems like the best option for general use as it has visual indicators for correct tension.
Edit: Pressure bandaging method from AVRU (Australian Venom Research Unit, Melbourne Uni)
corvus wrote:kbm63 wrote:"lack of any bite / fang marks does not exclude envenomation" (Primary Clinical Care Manual (PCCM) 7th edition )
Just a reminder that no fang marks doesn't mean no envenomation, and conversely seeing fang marks don't necessarily mean that the person has been envenomated. I wouldn't want to take the risk....... Have seen socks wet from venom after snake fangs went through the side of elastic sided boots and into the socks (person not envenomated) and someone else who had no obvious "bite marks" but ended up quite sick after a good history of probable snakebite.
Just a dumb question ,if the skin is not penetrated how does the venom get into the lymphatic system![]()
corvus
igor wrote:Anyway whats wrong with sucking out the blood?
Hallu wrote:You should never suck the blood out... the venom is injected too deep and spreads rapidly in a region where sucking it out won't work.
Hallu wrote:there isn't a concrete and fruitful study showing the benefits of this technique.
RESULTS:
The mean (+/- SEM) periphery-to-systemic circulation transit time after subcutaneous injection was 58 (+/- 7) minutes. The first-aid was found to be very effective when applied with bandage pressures ranging from 40 to 70 mmHg (5.3-9.3 kPa) in the upper limb and 55 to 70 mmHg (7.3-9.3 kPa) in the lower limb. Lower and higher bandage pressures were ineffective. However, despite first-aid measures, egress of radiotracer, even in the upper limbs, was seen in all subjects who walked for 10 minutes or more.
CONCLUSIONS:
Firm pressure bandaging is an effective means of restricting the lymphatic flow of toxins after envenomation, provided the bandage is applied within the defined pressure range. Strict limb immobilisation is necessary to minimise lymphatic flow, and walking after upper or lower limb envenomation will inevitably result in systemic envenomation despite first-aid measures.
photohiker wrote:Are you sure you would be dead today if you had been envenomated?
photohiker wrote:Talking of pressure bandages, this is a good time to remind ourselves that specific elastic pressure bandages work better than standard crepe bandages.
jackhinde wrote: You do need to update your snake bandage to a close woven elastic type, the one you have on has been shown to be unreliable.
igor wrote:The Indian guys said it is also how they are told to deal with snake bites in India. And there are a lot of snake over there.
photohiker wrote:Hallu wrote:there isn't a concrete and fruitful study showing the benefits of this technique.
You sure about that?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7830641
Med J Aust. 1994 Dec 5-19;161(11-12):695-700.
Lymphatic flow rates and first-aid in simulated peripheral snake or spider envenomation.
Howarth DM, Southee AE, Whyte IM.
John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW.RESULTS:
The mean (+/- SEM) periphery-to-systemic circulation transit time after subcutaneous injection was 58 (+/- 7) minutes. The first-aid was found to be very effective when applied with bandage pressures ranging from 40 to 70 mmHg (5.3-9.3 kPa) in the upper limb and 55 to 70 mmHg (7.3-9.3 kPa) in the lower limb. Lower and higher bandage pressures were ineffective. However, despite first-aid measures, egress of radiotracer, even in the upper limbs, was seen in all subjects who walked for 10 minutes or more.
CONCLUSIONS:
Firm pressure bandaging is an effective means of restricting the lymphatic flow of toxins after envenomation, provided the bandage is applied within the defined pressure range. Strict limb immobilisation is necessary to minimise lymphatic flow, and walking after upper or lower limb envenomation will inevitably result in systemic envenomation despite first-aid measures.
Hallu wrote:photohiker wrote:Hallu wrote:there isn't a concrete and fruitful study showing the benefits of this technique.
You sure about that?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7830641
Med J Aust. 1994 Dec 5-19;161(11-12):695-700.
Lymphatic flow rates and first-aid in simulated peripheral snake or spider envenomation.
Howarth DM, Southee AE, Whyte IM.
John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW.RESULTS:
The mean (+/- SEM) periphery-to-systemic circulation transit time after subcutaneous injection was 58 (+/- 7) minutes. The first-aid was found to be very effective when applied with bandage pressures ranging from 40 to 70 mmHg (5.3-9.3 kPa) in the upper limb and 55 to 70 mmHg (7.3-9.3 kPa) in the lower limb. Lower and higher bandage pressures were ineffective. However, despite first-aid measures, egress of radiotracer, even in the upper limbs, was seen in all subjects who walked for 10 minutes or more.
CONCLUSIONS:
Firm pressure bandaging is an effective means of restricting the lymphatic flow of toxins after envenomation, provided the bandage is applied within the defined pressure range. Strict limb immobilisation is necessary to minimise lymphatic flow, and walking after upper or lower limb envenomation will inevitably result in systemic envenomation despite first-aid measures.
I meant an international study.
Hallu wrote:The fact that this study could only be published in an Aussie paper isn't helping the seriousness (if any, I have no idea about that subject I'm no expert) of the method.
Return to Bushwalking Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests