Tue 28 Aug, 2012 9:49 pm
Wed 29 Aug, 2012 1:42 pm
Robert H wrote:The WBA is described on the One Planet website as having 'reasonable scrub resistance'. That does not equate to off-track walking in my mind.
Wed 29 Aug, 2012 1:50 pm
ollster wrote:Robert H wrote:The WBA is described on the One Planet website as having 'reasonable scrub resistance'. That does not equate to off-track walking in my mind.
Well, to me that sounds like it should definitely be up for some punishment - it does use the word "reasonable". That doesn't infer "don't take the pack into the scrub" now does it?
Wed 29 Aug, 2012 1:59 pm
Strider wrote:I didn't see any arguement![]()
"Reasonable" suggests on-track usage to me also.
Wed 29 Aug, 2012 6:58 pm
ollster wrote:Strider wrote:"Reasonable" suggests on-track usage to me also.
Off track has scrub, and so saying reasonable scrub resistance would lead one to think it was a "reasonable" option to take into scrub. That doesn't infer "don't take the pack into the scrub" now does it?
ollster wrote:You've been around what? 5 minutes, and you're picking arguments with people who've been on more walks that you're mum's cooked you hot dinners? Not a very smart move for a noob.
Wed 29 Aug, 2012 8:12 pm
Wed 29 Aug, 2012 8:55 pm
Wed 29 Aug, 2012 9:07 pm
Robert H wrote:...I was speaking in relation to what I consider the more common definition of off-track walking, which involves (hardcore) abuse..
© Bushwalk Australia and contributors 2007-2013.