And now for something completely different...

I caught these at Cradle Mountain NP on Saturday. Taken with a 30D and a 100/2.8 macro, on a tripod, ISO 200, Av 6.3, Tv 1/40.

What do you think?

Last edited by the_camera_poser on Fri 09 Oct, 2009 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

[tasadam]

Um, cold!
Pretty cranky aren't they. I've taken close ups of ice in tarns and puddles on tracks before, but I can't remember ever using the macro.
Great find, interesting detail.

[banter]It could have been better though, might I suggest you consider a Nikon?[/banter]

Naw, I prefer a camera that likes the cold, not one of those sissified-studio-prima donnas SOME people use.

[tasadam]

[banter]

OK, since you forgot the banter quotes, you asked for this...

Honestly though, if the cost of Nikon was lower, I'd have been pretty keen to get into them instead of Canon. (drooling)

I'm not all that keen on Nikon, but there's a few cameras they make I'd gladly buy

... up to the level of Canon or Nikon.

Nikon, for example, makes a great DSLR

That new Nikon D90 is pretty sweet

[/banter]
Geez I crack myself up...

All pre-5DMkII my friend. I questioned my faith, but I have again seen the light. I am an infidel no more....

[tasadam]

What?
Only 21.1 Megapixels?
Even their "flagship" 1DS mk III has 21.1 Mp, and you can pay as much as $15381.
Have a look at the new Nikon D3x with 24.5 Mp
Who's drooling now?

Anyhow, you know we'll never admit... It's that kind of game. Apart from your quotes above, that is
I've had my fun, I'll leave it alone. Back to the photos.

yeah, but they had to put them all inside a tank!

And despite all your Noink thuggery- I still think Canon pictures have a better look too them. I don't like the colour cast Noink gives to everything.

[tasadam]

A tank?
A tank that weighs 5 grams heavier than the Canoff 1DS III
I guess over 3 million pixels weighs 5 grams.

Colour cast? Don't you shoot raw?
Seriously tho, I think it would be fair to drop the banter for now and give someone else a chance to comment on your images. We've had our fun. I gotta go anyhow.
To be continued... Or not.

[samh]

I caught these at Cradle Mountain NP on Saturday. Taken with a 30D and a 100/2.8 macro, on a tripod, ISO 200, Av 6.3, Tv 1/40.

What do you think?

Hi camera poser, I see you have been to Cradle on Sat. How were the conditions up there, any snow?

[corvus]

I think you may have sent me the wrong link ( I hope)
Gerry

No snow- lots of ice, but it was melting around lunchtime. I was back up there today, hoping to catch the sunrise I missed by 20 minutes yesterday, but there was low cloud cover. Perfect for waterfall photos though.

Weather's been quite good, and the park has been almost empty. I spent two hours photographing the falls at the lodge from the bridge, and never once did anyone walk past, other than a couple when I first got there. I walked about 1 km onto the Dove Lake circuit and then came back at dawn- there was once person other than me there. And at Pencil Pine falls around 10pm I had about an hour to myself.

[samh]

Do you live in the park or just having a long holiday up there
Thank you for the weather report, I hope this week wont be to bad, as I head for the OLT tomorrow.

samh

[Mickeymoo]

Nice shots again, they show some nice detail.

[north-north-west]

Ahhhh, another ice freak. G'day.
Marvellous stuff, innit? Every puddle is different, all the patterns, the layers. Fascinating.
And well caught, too.

Do you live in the park or just having a long holiday up there
Thank you for the weather report, I hope this week wont be to bad, as I head for the OLT tomorrow.

samh

I'm 45 minutes away. It's my backyard playground. In the 10 months we've lived here we've been there AT LEAST 50 times. We go up for coffees when we feel like a drive, and it's my photographic spot of choice, as you can imagine.

[lexharris]

Nice shots camera_poser, I like them. Macro opens a whole new world and ice offers endless and fascinating variety. I always carry at least one macro lens and extension tubes on walks. I've used longer lenses (like 100mm in 35mm format) but I was constantly disappointed by camera shake in the images even with sturdy tripod and MLU. Shorter lenses seem to work better for me - smaller, lighter and less prone to camera shake. I sometimes use a 35mm TS with extension tube - close-up with tilt, nice.

[stepbystep]

nICE pics,
I'm constantly frustrated on walks, I find most of the beauty of Tas in the minuscule and minute details. I'm always trying to capture these 'moments' but my Olympus C-460 ZOOOOM just lets me down every time.
Mind you my framing is equisite
I have a $100K edit suite and a $50 camera....must prioritise.
Meanwhile I will live vicariously through you guys.

Cheers