Hughmac wrote:Sadly there's not really anything significant that anyone can do. One way or the other nature will take its course, but a lot will depend on rainfall regimes moving forward. I suspect there will be some significant changes to the affected forests - the rainforests that have burnt are probably history now.
wildwanderer wrote:If people got together and planted rainforest plants in the areas burnt how likely is the rainforest area to recover and once again become rainforest?
Moondog55 wrote:After the fires die and areas start to open up do people have any suggestions?
Warin wrote:Next expected rainfall of any real consequence is not till March/April ....
Any feeding/watering would have to be maintain at least untill then...
Moondog55 wrote:Food and water stations sound like a very good idea as does the idea of adding in nesting boxes.
I must admit tho that I was thinking more along the lines of tubestock and some sort of biodegradable watering station to assist in plant establishment
CraigVIC wrote:GST is a regressive tax.
Moondog55 wrote:CraigVIC wrote:GST is a regressive tax.
Most probably but what do you suggest? This work will take a generation and trillions of dollars
ribuck wrote:Just wondering aloud here...
It might be a good time to deal decisively with feral animals while the drought and fires have reduced their numbers and weakened them, and when the recovering native animals would benefit the most from the absence of ferals. Maybe, after the fires, there could be an "open weekend" when shooters can enter the national parks and kill any feral animal.
ribuck wrote:Just wondering aloud here...
It might be a good time to deal decisively with feral animals while the drought and fires have reduced their numbers and weakened them, and when the recovering native animals would benefit the most from the absence of ferals. Maybe, after the fires, there could be an "open weekend" when shooters can enter the national parks and kill any feral animal.
ghosta wrote:Be carefull what you wish for.
Warin wrote:ribuck wrote:Just wondering aloud here...
It might be a good time to deal decisively with feral animals while the drought and fires have reduced their numbers and weakened them, and when the recovering native animals would benefit the most from the absence of ferals. Maybe, after the fires, there could be an "open weekend" when shooters can enter the national parks and kill any feral animal.
The farmers are out 'putting down' their injured stock. The same should be done for other animals.
Amateur shooters won't get far in a weekend, nor will they be that prolific. The resource that could be used is the Army - trained sharp shooters with choppers. As there should be on one in these burn out areas it could be a good time to target feral animals too, giving the natives a better go at survival.
Son of a Beach wrote:One of my concerns about post-fire wilderness is the ease with which weeds can take hold.
The ground around the first few km of the Moses Creek Track in the Walls of Jerusalem is now 100% covered in weeds after the native ground cover was destroyed in a bushfire. I was shocked when I walked in that way about a year ago, for the first time in years.
Were the weed seeds brought in on the clothing of bushwalkers? I do not know. But it's a possibility. Could also be from nearby forestry works. Either way, it's a disaster.
johnw wrote:Son of a Beach wrote:One of my concerns about post-fire wilderness is the ease with which weeds can take hold.
The ground around the first few km of the Moses Creek Track in the Walls of Jerusalem is now 100% covered in weeds after the native ground cover was destroyed in a bushfire.Do you know which weed species Nik?
Return to Bushwalking Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests