DonQx wrote:http://www.peterstorm.com/1nylon.htm
Very light, robust, packs small, breathable (if that's the right word?), much better quality at a lower price than any other similar jackets/pants I've seen
Earthling wrote:DonQx wrote:http://www.peterstorm.com/1nylon.htm
Very light, robust, packs small, breathable (if that's the right word?), much better quality at a lower price than any other similar jackets/pants I've seen
Ive looked for major reviews of Peter Storms products but could not find any. Do you know of any?
I also looked for product weights and breathability tests but again nothing. Do you know of any?
The site has limited info and poor product photos and Ebay doesnt give me much more......
Looks like a good product but need more info...will email them in the meantime.
Alternatively to his jackets, the MONTANE ATOMIC DT LIGHT are promoted and reviewed as being a very good jacket:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... 0299014770
Franco wrote:...in a certain other forum were I managed to get Campbell Junor (Macpac part-owner) to reply to my comments with lots of capital letters. .
alliecat wrote:It also has a "drop-tail" cut (long at the back, short at the front, kind of the jacket equivalent of a mullet)
Nuts wrote:I'd seen that chart on another site, is that what everyone is basing the 'hard sell' on? Interesting...
Is that genuine question? I didn't mention lighter (that was a quote from Franco, in reference to a lightweight jacket (Traverese) I was discussing elsewhere. For Tassie bushwalking the Resolution or Prophet are more suitable) Anyways.. I'm not the typr to wear nothing under a rain jacketNuts wrote: OK, anyhow, I still dont see the relevance to Bushwalking in Tassie. My question was that unless you are wearing nothing under a shell then why is something lighter and more breathable necessary.
Mate who suggesting you go change- you are happy with the level of performance you are getting. Take a look at how Goretex tests- is it really that much better that PU? Entrant is PU....(and very close to macpac 'reflex' fabric) and there performance level is not that different, but the price is.. A guy in here was condidering his options, and now eVent has started to get the momentum they deserve, and the consumer has a new best option.Nuts wrote:If one Tassie jacket- then wouldnt something able to retain heat and stop the wind be better (ie one of the gore fabrics) Sure, the technology is getting old but why is an expensive change needed. I'm sure if you could answer these in any measurable sense your sales would be (even?) better.In my experience the gore fabrics Are somewhat better than PU coated 'breathability' wise, besides that I bought the jacket for the other features (ie pitzips, vent pockets etc.) and cause I was most interested in it being WaterProof, and providing adequate strength and warmth in the coldest, roughest tassie conditions.
Nuts wrote:I guess I'm not the perfect 'target market', for easy conversion, without a huge disposable income and with feet on the ground..
My guess is that you wouldn't make the same comments about goretex if it was still all you had to sell![]()
Nuts wrote:Nothing personal, we'd probably never hear from most of those other manufacturers on that chart... (who are probably scrambling for a supply of event, (and selling everything else) before they start bagging the old fabrics...)
Franco wrote:Nuts
You can relax now. I have checked with Parks and Wildlife Services (Tasmania), according to them eVent will not be compulsory for a few years and you will still be allowed to use your beloved jacket in the foreseeable future.
Good O.... I'll get the life span the marketers predicted
That takes me to my second point: why would you want to test an item that is obviously useless to you and just a marketing ploy to get people to spend more money?
Err... so I spend less. (I didn't say they were useless?)
BTW, jackets, technically speaking, are neither warm nor breathable,
I agree. I wonder who used the term 'breathable' in the first place?
Though it does stand to reason that the more 'breathable' the less warm?
(Which was BTW what made me ponder the question (as related to the topic and especially in tassie), just how much of an improvement they would be (as related to bushwalking))
but then again the sun does not set and we have stopped dialling phones some time ago.
Ahhem!
Franco
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests