Franco wrote:Yes I have read about the noise but that has not been my experience.
On one trip i was camping with two other guys with Neos , three tents three Neos,10 nights. So I asked about the noise . Their reply was "what noise ?'
Sometime I think it works like it doe with UFO sightings.
Till the day a journalist misquoted some comments and came up with the term "flying saucers" nobody had reported disk shaped UFOs up till then. However they became very popular after...
Franco
mjdalessa wrote:I was really happy with my downmat 7 until it got a slow leak for no apparent reason on day 3 out of 7. Was not happy.
andrewa wrote:Um...... How does a neo-air whatever , or anything else, compare with a std 1980s thermarest.
I'm looking for something I can be warm on on Bogong in snow for a weekend ski touring. To date I've been happy with the std ?1.5" thick short length thermarest for many years, but now looking for something lighter. I think that thermarest weighed about 750g. Looking at neo-air x-light.....any suggestions??
A
Franco wrote:Yes I have read about the noise but that has not been my experience.
On one trip i was camping with two other guys with Neos , three tents three Neos,10 nights. So I asked about the noise . Their reply was "what noise ?'
Sometime I think it works like it doe with UFO sightings.
Strider wrote:Exped ... are miles ahead of anything by Thermarest in terms of ... build quality.
Son of a Beach wrote:Strider wrote:Exped ... are miles ahead of anything by Thermarest in terms of ... build quality.
How do you figure this? What are your sources for this information. You only have to search this forum to find multiple cases of Exped mat failures. I've not read the same about Thermarest. Reports by many readers here confirm that the Exped downmats are exceptionally comfortable, but that some of their other mats, at least, are not very reliable.
Strider wrote:Son of a Beach wrote:Strider wrote:Exped ... are miles ahead of anything by Thermarest in terms of ... build quality.
How do you figure this? What are your sources for this information. You only have to search this forum to find multiple cases of Exped mat failures. I've not read the same about Thermarest. Reports by many readers here confirm that the Exped downmats are exceptionally comfortable, but that some of their other mats, at least, are not very reliable.
Personal experience. I am comparing only to the Neoair range here.
I at first avoided Exped for the reason you mention. But after trying the Neoair, there really was no competition - the Exped is the better of the two, hands down.
Son of a Beach wrote:On what grounds, though? What personal experience did you have that has caused you to draw the conclusion that the Exped build quality is better than the Thermarest build quality? What went wrong with your Thermarest, for example? What model was it?
I'm just curious as to how you formed that opinion because it is contrary to the opinions of many other topics here, some by people who've had multiple failures over short periods of time and have detailed the problems and experiences they've had.
I am tired and grumpy so excuse my potentially berating post.
Strider wrote:"Apparently a common cause for Exped mat failures is delamination due to the increased air pressure from heat."
This is covered by the Exped instructions that come with the mat.
Strider wrote:Exped ... are miles ahead of anything by Thermarest in terms of ... build quality.
Strider wrote:The Neoair just felt so fragile! To be honest it scared me to even lay on it. Whereas the Exped feels strong and robust.
Son of a Beach wrote:Strider wrote:Exped ... are miles ahead of anything by Thermarest in terms of ... build quality.Strider wrote:The Neoair just felt so fragile! To be honest it scared me to even lay on it. Whereas the Exped feels strong and robust.
So you are saying that the Exped is better in terms of build quality purely on the grounds of how it looks and feels, and not on the grounds of actual reliability in field use? No worries.
In terms of actual reliability, the Expeds appear to have poorer build quality based on actual field use and failure rates (according to the number of reported failures in topics on this site).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests