Apologies in advance if my question is another one of those 'How long is a piece of string?' questions.
I am looking at updating my old Paddy Pallin Bimberi sleeping bag, which I know several people on these forums have also had in the past. The bag I'm currently thinking of getting is the Sea to Summit Latitude, although I'm not sure on whether to get the I or II version.
Most of my hiking is done over spring & autumn, camping in a two or three person mesh inner tent. I am hoping to do a bit more over the winter months in future, with the most likely destinations being to the Grampians, Goldfields, etc. I also have some plans of heading up to the high country in late spring/early summer. I currently used an Exped UL 7 synmat as my sleeping mat. We also do a bit of car camping over both the summer and winter months, staying in our camper trailer around areas such as Gundagai, etc., although I am usually only in the sleeping bag during the winter months.
I currently find the Bimberi bag adequate, although in winter & colder periods have had to head to bed with my thermals and also pants, down jacket, etc. I would not call myself an overly cold or warm sleeper, although I have noticed that the 15 kg I've lost in recent times has resulted me feeling the cold a little bit more than I once did.
With the Bimberi being a late 90's bag, I obviously haven't been able to get any temperature ratings to allow me to compare it to modern bags. At the moment I'm probably leaning towards the Latitude II (although if I can get away with the Latitude I it will knock a few more grams off what I need to carry).
So my questions are:
Is the Latitude I a big jump up from my current Bimberi bag? Is it likely to be suitable for what I have described above, or would I be better off with the Latitude II bag - I'm assuming I will be too warm in both bags over summer and would whichever one I get opened up as a quilt.
Many thanks in advance for your thoughts.
edit: Here is the
link for info on the Sea to Summit Latitude bags