GPSGuided wrote:Gosh, how did they come up with that body design in 2013! Terrible.
icefest wrote:I like it :S
wayno wrote:nikon are still in love with slr's,,,, their mirroless leave a lot to be desired, besides they use sony sensors...
GPSGuided wrote:icefest wrote:I like it :S
You do know that exposes your age (or rather your youth), right? It's the look of SLR camera bodies from the 70s. I like some of those classics, but not again in the digital age and in a miniature form.
photohiker wrote:Regardless of the looks (this is about the output, not the fashion), these two cameras look to be a new landmark in the mirrorless segment.
GPSGuided wrote:photohiker wrote:Regardless of the looks (this is about the output, not the fashion), these two cameras look to be a new landmark in the mirrorless segment.
Ummm... It'll be interesting.
BTW, that's a nice link. Looks like it's not that much smaller than a D5200, but has full frame. Otherwise, I say it's a bit of a stretch to compare it to D800e and similar Canon offering. Those full featured pro models have a lot more the new kid on the block can't match.
GPSGuided wrote:I wouldn't worry about the IQ at this stage. Wait for bug fixed production firmware. Otherwise and as said earlier, I have never truly liked Sony camera's colour rendition.
icefest wrote:Take photos in .raw and do the pp yourself?
photohiker wrote:Re being 'not much smaller than the D5200' No, it's a LOT smaller:
GPSGuided wrote:You do know that exposes your age (or rather your youth), right? It's the look of SLR camera bodies from the 70s.
GPSGuided wrote:wayno wrote:I dislike those mirror-less bodies for the difference in composing through a quality optical prism finder and a hard to see LCD screen.
Nuts wrote:IQ wise are they directly transferable (ie. ok 20mpff = 32mp dx (not 24))?
I think i'm outa my league here, as much as i'd like to make meter high prints like all you guys
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest