It provides a new opportunity for people to walk in this remarkable wilderness in safety...
tastrax wrote: They are 'grants' but I am not sure if they are ever paid back!
weetbix456 wrote:Can not fathom...is there actually anything we can do?? Blahhhh!! Feeling pretty frustrated & useless...
gayet wrote:Announcement of taxpayer funded private development for SC track
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-04/federal-funding-for-private-huts-in-tasmania-wilderness-area/9724798
potato wrote:The closest example is the Cradle Huts. I wonder how the punters who struggle on the Overland will go on the Ironbound etc. Perhaps the recue helicopter will get a few more callouts each year.
Nuts wrote:And, goodness me, among our 'Greenies': Bob backs the Tarkine Trail, The Greens think the Lk Geeves proposal is ok.. just the other day i hear Richard Flanagan throwing up the notion of grand tracks off the back of Wello. Is there some tricky, desperate political maneuvering or is the support as cute/populist/capitulating/nutty and ill-considered as it seems?
Nuts wrote:
The Greens think the Lk Geeves proposal is ok
Freewalker68 wrote:Even worse to consider is that elections are not free, or rigged. Then it's just their agenda at the expense of sound public infrastructure, with money flowing to absolute sustainable and ecologically sound practice but accessible to all walkers not just $$$ people.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests