haven't seen a NEX yet, but the dpreview was not very happy with the interface.
photohiker wrote:Unlikely that something cheaper will come along at photokina. There might be something better come along, but not cheaper.
samh wrote:photohiker wrote:Unlikely that something cheaper will come along at photokina. There might be something better come along, but not cheaper.
Sorry, I meant that some of the older models maybe reduced in price once the new models get on the shelves.
photohiker wrote:I should declare that I am biased, I have a GF1
Photo reviewers can go off the rails and declare an interface crazy when it is not, that is why I always suggest people go and hold the actual cameras in their hands. Could be that you are just as crazy as the interface designer
Also worth noticing that the Sony is an APS HD sensor, which is larger than the u4/3rds sensor.
Sony NEX5: 23.4 x 15.6 mm Exmor APS HD CMOS Sensor
Panasonic GF1: 18 x 13.5 mm 4/3 type MOS ('Live MOS sensor')
Tony wrote:I have considered DSLR’s to heavy.
Tony wrote:I have some questions, why did you choose the GF-1 over others and now that you have used you GF-1 for a while what do you think of it and how easy is it to use.
samh wrote:Tony wrote:I have considered DSLR’s to heavy.
Hm,
Nikon D3100 + 18-55mm ~ 710g, not much more than the Lumix, but probably more bulky.
Note also that the Olympus and the Sony come without an inbuilt flash.
But I have to say i'm biased too. Always have used Nikon DSLR and it doesn't look like it's going to change.
photohiker wrote:Tony wrote:I have some questions, why did you choose the GF-1 over others and now that you have used you GF-1 for a while what do you think of it and how easy is it to use.
Hi Tony,
The GF1 was lighter and faster than the Olympus EP1, and it's menu system was easier (for me) to use. There really wasn't a lot in it but the ease of use was the biggest factor for me. Soon after I bought the GF1, out came the EP2, and then the EPL1 - I haven't looked at them, they may be equivalent or better.
I was looking for an alternative to a full frame DSLR to use on multiday hikes. It performs that role very well, and delivers surprisingly good images given the difference in the sensor size between it and my 5D. I use the 7-14mm (14-28mm equivalent) quite a lot, but if I really want to keep the weight and bulk down, the 20mm 1.7 (100g) is a very capable lens, and takes the combined weight down to roughly 485g. The camera is quite easy to use, like all things, it takes a little while to become accustomed to the controls, and ultimately the camera is not quite as flexible as the 5D but it is certainly no slouch. I'd like for the EVF to have a larger eyepiece and better resolution, perhaps that will come with the next update.
samh, the Nikon D3100 is a great camera, and given its a 1.5 crop camera, the kit 18-55 lens is a 27-82.5mm equivalent. That's not nearly wide enough for me. The 7-14mm in the photo is a very high quality ultrawide zoom lens but weighs just 300g. If you wanted something roughly equivalent to the 7-14 on the D3100 you'd need a 10-20mm and that would take the combo up around a kilo. By way of comparison, I use a Canon 17-40mm on my 5D, the lens alone weighs 475g and the camera and lens combo is about 1370g, so you can see why this micro gear is attractive to me for multiday hikes.
Tony wrote:3: Panasonic Lumix Gf1:
http://cameras.teds.com.au/camera/Panas ... umix%20Gf1
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/
Brett wrote:Tony wrote:3: Panasonic Lumix Gf1:
http://cameras.teds.com.au/camera/Panas ... umix%20Gf1
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/
Hi Tony
Thanks for thread and the links. Has any one with a SLR used this camera or its smaller brother the L3 which I believe is been replaced by the L5. I have a Canon 400D which I am very happy with but when my Canon S70 started to show its age after one too many soakings I chose a Canon D10 and was rather under whelmed by the picture quality. Was given a brochure for the new Ricoh's GXR http://www.ricohcameras.com.au/Cameras/GXR.html which changes the lens and sensor in the same package so results in a system that has better dust resisting performance so might suit bushwalking better. Anyone used one of those.
Cheers Brett
Brett wrote:The Canon 10D is rugged little blighter
And like that's and accident! You're suppose to confuse them. "I've heard how great this 10D is, and wow look at that price" - buys a D10 for $350!photohiker wrote:Why do they make cameras with names so close that they can be so easily confused, even from the same manufacturer?
Brett wrote:Tony wrote:3: Panasonic Lumix Gf1:
http://cameras.teds.com.au/camera/Panas ... umix%20Gf1
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/
Hi Tony
Thanks for thread and the links. Has any one with a SLR used this camera or its smaller brother the L3 which I believe is been replaced by the L5. I have a Canon 400D which I am very happy with but when my Canon S70 started to show its age after one too many soakings I chose a Canon D10 and was rather under whelmed by the picture quality. Was given a brochure for the new Ricoh's GXR http://www.ricohcameras.com.au/Cameras/GXR.html which changes the lens and sensor in the same package so results in a system that has better dust resisting performance so might suit bushwalking better. Anyone used one of those.
Cheers Brett
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests