ILUVSWTAS wrote:Yes yes same old question...... I dont want to spend over $1000
whynotwalk wrote:Good guess Mark - or else another demonstration of how photo savvy you are
... Yes, the second photo is taken with the digital SLR. It's "warmer" and sharper in most parts of the pic.
cheers
Peter
jcr_au wrote:Taking weight, performance and price into consideration, perhaps also have a look at one of these
http://digital-photography-school.com/sony-nex-3-review
Nuts wrote:jcr_au wrote:Taking weight, performance and price into consideration, perhaps also have a look at one of these
http://digital-photography-school.com/sony-nex-3-review
There are some pretty obvious comments further down the page, not exactly much smaller with that useable lens, so whats the point?
I'm still trying to get my head around digital in general but all this is interesting. Also looking for a nice compact, was liking the Lumix (may need to skim it across a river (or frozen lake) sometime ) but it all moves so fast these days. The main point will be better image quality than the Olympus mju with the same toughness, perhaps current image quality is worth the change over?
whynotwalk wrote:
One DSLR-user's tip from me: I "wear" my camera while bushwalking, using a water resistant case called a "Zing Case". That way I don't have to stop & unpack the camera every time I want to take a pic. It's liberated how I take photos while walking. They have to be imported, eg from http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7 ... Cover.html
Here's a pic. of me wearing mine,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests