I'm looking to replace my old compact Canon SX260 HS. It's been great for wildlife photography, with its 20x zoom. But after a couple of years in the bush, some scratches can't be removed, and I'd like to do better photos : more sensibility, a polarizer, etc...without losing the zoom. I don't care about weight, frankly I don't like paying extra just for compactness.
I don't want to go SLR yet (I don't have the budget anyway), and I'd like to compromise between photo quality and high zoom (at least 20x). No compact offers this, the ones that do the best photos have a 4x zoom max usually. So I'm thinking about a bridge, the Panasonic Lumix FZ200 looks nice because it offers a constant focal length ( f/2.8 ) over the whole zoom range (25 -600 mm), which is pretty rare. It's also not too expensive : about 500 $. Do you guys think it'll be a big improvement compared to the compact Canon, or should I add a couple of hundred dollars to my budget to find something better (such as ?) ? Should I buy an hybrid + lens instead ? Thanks in advance for your help.
PS : I'm also a big puzzled by prices. A compact with a smaller zoom like this one : http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/01/10 ... 1X_Preview costs much more than the FZ200 , and I don't understand that... Is it just because it's compact ? You pay for the lightweight ? That makes be a bit suspicious regarding the low price for the FZ200 actually...