Miyata610 wrote:As I've said before, I'm really very happy with the poor quality ancient tasmaps that memory map supply for very little money. They're good enough for my purposes.
colinm wrote:Anyway, I'd start by reading the Tasmanian Right to Information Act 2009 http://goo.gl/mvXiv and the associated regulations http://goo.gl/t3NEF to see if there are any specific exclusions which would put geodata outside the scope of the act. I haven't read it, but I sort of doubt there will be.
tastrax wrote:A person is not entitled under this Part to –
(b) information that may be purchased at a reasonable cost in accordance with arrangements made by a public authority.
colinm wrote:So that information is available *now*? Right now? If it's one of those vague future promises, that won't cut it - you should put the application in ASAP. Will the data be available to *you*? Do you know that? How do you know that?
Secondly, the question of 'reasonable cost' ... it should be just above the marginal cost of production, is it? Alternatively, you can probably get a measure of 'reasonable cost' from the Act ... it'll tell you what the act itself considers reasonable. If it costs 1 hour at $30 per hour to generate the data but they want to charge $300 for the same data, it could be argued that that cost is not reasonable.
"appear to be 200dpi maps which are worse definition than a paper map and they are not usable in the field once printed"
DonQx wrote:"appear to be 200dpi maps which are worse definition than a paper map and they are not usable in the field once printed"
had a quick look at a 1:25,000 on CD here at work
quality is certainly good enough to print & use in the field
screenshot below with image info (IrfanView), jpg format 65% quality ... are these 200dpi? ... not sure that my talents are good enuf to work that out
"they do not print, even with commercial printing, well enough for serious field work"
6290 x 3145 pixels
Print that at the standard 300ppi and you have a map 21 x 10.5 inches (53 x 27cm) Compact!
The problem is the size of the lines and the lack of fine detail when viewed at print size. On the GPS, its even worse - as you zoom in all you get is blur.
DonQx wrote:looks to me like a bit of a difference, but is it that big for practical purposes?
north-north-west wrote:Just had a look at Tasmap's website. If you can navigate to the relevant page, they're quoting $1,100 for the statewide set of 1:25,00 maps.
north-north-west wrote:If I could afford to take it to court, I could afford the insane price they're asking for the data.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests