Nuts wrote:Nothing here is 'necessary' icefest. Not even your contribution to tell me so. I agree it takes two to Tango but this time I wasn't dancing.
Maybe 'necessary' is not the most descriptive word and 'constructive' would be more apt.
I'm hoping this conversation will be constructive (i.e. the forums will be nicer than if I hadn't said anything).
Nuts wrote:I know how it seems, another attack.. Read the topic that spurned his distaste. If you consider that I (among others) have suffered his vicious personal attacks (the worst of which have been deleted), offered to discus his issue by pm, acknowledged that his was a good question, tried humour, excused any comments of offence, tried to keep his suggestion open for discussion, tried to explain the use of 'Forum & Site'... I thought it worthwhile subjecting myself to lord-knows-what.. to tell him what seems to remain when eliminating the obvious.
If you know it seems to be another attack then why say it that way?
I've been reading both this entire topic and the topic that spurned his diastase as they occurred, I even read most of the more spiteful comments before they were deleted/moderated. I did not reply because I did not think that I could add to the conversation.
Is someone else's conduct a worthwhile excuse?
Nuts wrote:ps. and no, telling someone so may not exactly be pc but that crisis is for others to ponder.
Shall we ponder it together, in the interest of future conversations?
TL;DR I understand that you are @#$@#ed off at him/her but you've been here longer so you should hold yourself up to higher standards.
Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful.